Resumen Ejecutivo Toma Tirolesa Ingles 622h6j

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL : 

OSCAR ORTIZ CHUNGA



JOSE CRUZ MEDINA



GUEVARA FERNADEZ

MARLM Adrianzén CERVERA



PEDRO 

ARANA ANGEL VASQUEZ COURSE: HYDRAULIC WORKS

JOSE RAMOS ING.ARBULU TEACHING:

THEME: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF TOMAS TYROLEAN SECTION: "A"

Bocatoma Laimi ñ to ........................... ................................. .11

2016 INDEX



INTRODUCTION .............................. ... .................................... 2



CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS



UBICACI CRITERIA OR N ...... ...................................... ....... .3 

Bocatoma DEL RIO TOACHI ............................................. ..12 

OTHER STUDIES ......... ............................................. ............ 4



CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS



ANALYSIS AND EVALUATIONTIROLESA ...... .............................. ..5



................................................... Jadib amba Bocatoma ..6









CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS

Kora Bocatoma Tiquipaya .......................................... .. ... .7 



CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS

Bocatoma Apote ................................. ................................. 8 



CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS

PALMA DEL RIO Bocatoma (JUNIN) ....................................... ..10 



CHARACTERISTICS



SOLUTIONS

DETERIORATION CAUSES PROBOCAN ........................... 13 ADVANTAGES OF MAKING TIROLESA .................. .. ............... 13 VIDEOS ............................................... ..................................... ..13 

BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................... .................................... ..14 

INTRODUCTION The issue is not simple water intakes for the design of these consideration of theoretical, experimental and practical aspects is required. For the study of a water intake it is necessary to note that a river transports the following:  RUSHING from water or n occurring in the basin.  S or lidos, also called Appen sediment from the erosion or n of the basin. 

Ice in places there.

 Extra ñ os bodies as trees, plants, garbage and waste. Usually rivers carry large amounts of solids, either as background or suspension. During these avenues they are greatly increased quantities and are a series difficulty for the design and operation of water intakes in the water to be captured with the least possible amount of solids.

CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING THE SITE OF THE WORK MAKING Site selection for location of the zip line takes, consider the following aspects: 

R í or slope.



Lido flow S or R í or

All rivers carrying solid material, either in the form of suspended material or transport line. In different studies the various works of guy takes tirolesa has been analyzed that a high concentration of solid material in suspension is not appropriate for decision. Such is the case for example of the basins .For contrast, a low concentration of solid material is very appropriate.

River Course The course of the river has a significant importance in deciding the location of the intake. As noted above, the straight river courses are favorable for uniform water through the vent age. 

Fundaci field or n

The type of material subgrade is very important for the stability of a shot in a

river. Overall control types of bedrock and alluvial bed differ. In the case of zip lines take, it is recommended that they are founded on rock. 

Watershed Management

The integrated management of the basin (MIC), which is to design a project for the use of water resources, including a zip line takes, must be analyzed based on the importance and impact of the project in its area of influence. Microsystems watered from 2 to 10 ha and small irrigation systems with an area of 10 100 ha, generally do not require a MIC area. 

Other Studies

After deciding the location of the intake based on topography, geomorphology and flow requirements capture, calculation of maximum flood for a time of recurrence, which is generally accepted 100 years, information is performed the dam and the stability of the riverbed where decision is designed to be located. A first analysis corresponds to the behavior of the riverbed with construction of a dam over the cross section to determine the protection of the headworks and other necessary work to ensure their proper functioning. In parallel, a detailed analysis of the behavior of the basin and its potential risks is also necessary to conduct studies to determine the silting, its grain size, and investigate the shape and power of the riverbed, and the location of the bed rock.

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION IN CONSTRUCTION

OF TOMAS TYROLEAN Study on design criteria and construction of zip lines take in the environmental context. The research was raised in order to perform such analysis making through research and analysis. Tyrolean outlets are suitable for mountainous areas, but in our country (Peru), are in small amount compared to other types of built in alluvial flat areas shots, so has not given them significant attention in research . Most experiences is based on standard models developed for irrigation mountainous areas, and eta reason found design problems:



Integrated watershed management



Ubicaci or n of the headworks



Silting



Destruction or n dissipation structures or



Grid tamponade



Maintenance decision

1. Bocatoma Jadibamba (TRUJILLO) TAKE SPECIAL FEATURES The intake has a length of 5.5 m along which the box structure that receives the river, with a width of 2.0 m was built. Finally, the grid was composed of railway rails with a width of 1.5 m and a spacing of 0.02 m. In the left margin, before shooting, has built a wall of cyclopean concrete channeling of 8.0 m long, 2.0 m high, 1.0 m wide at the bottom and 0.50 m on top. Downstream of the outlet, this wall extends 12 m in length, and then there is a protection gabion wall 16 m in length, which protects the

headrace channel that develops parallel to the wall on the left bank

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS The intake has been affected in the central part due to the construction of a baffle wall on the right side, which causes the water flow to concentrate on the left margin, leaving the structure of decision vulnerable. This, and the lack of maintenance and control of the river, upstream of the outlet, have resulted in the partial destruction of the dam where the grid was located, as seen in the photograph. The construction site is considered making the right decision because it was located on a straight stretch, with natural protection of the right margin because of the rocky outcrop. However, from the hydraulic point of view, there is a concentration of flow to the left margin due to the rocky outcrop that acts as a cross dam the river, resulting in flood season has a considerable burden of water intake and substantially increase the speed of the water. In these cases, it is recommended that the river has the cross section at the same level and with sufficient area to evacuate flood design.

2. Kora Tiquipaya SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE WORK. The zip line takes, has a length of 13 m and a width of 1.5 m inclined grid. The difference in level between the highest and lowest grid is 0.70 m. The structure consists of a metal frame 0.08 m wide with iron bars (billets) 1 "thickness and spacing of 0.02 m. Upstream of the structure there gabion walls on both margins. In the case of the right side walls, two walls deflectors that

direct the flow of water to the other bank. The output structure is on the right side, protected by a wall of Cyclopean concrete. Downstream of the outlet, have been constructed gabion walls cross the river to power dissipation.

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. L a obr a d e tom a est á ubicad a e n u n rí o co n régime n torrencia ly gra n cantida d d e arrastr e d e materiales , pedrone s d e diámetr o mayo r a 0, 5 m , qu e ha n destr uid o parcialment e lo s muro stransversale s d e gavione s construido s par a l a disipa ció n d e energía . L a obr a n o cuent a co n u n contro l d e torrent; e s deci r, co n u n p urif or l f i l per l longitudina l lech or l torren t, po r l or andwhat is to Merce d th e s s d e socavació process n y sedimentación . Est o implic a qu e lo s costo s d e manteni mient o sea n altos , fundamentalment e e n l a protecció n d e l a socavación . L a gra ncantida d d e sedimento s qu e arrastr a e l torrent e hac e qu e e lf luj o d e agu a de l rí o deb a se r dirigid o d e form a manua l t o l Luga r d e l grid, tant or e n FREECODE o r d e estiaj and com or d e rains,Haciend or bastant and l will work OPERATION n d e l a decision. The sub - basin has areas at risk of erosion due to significant deterioration of its environment.

3. Apote SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE WORK. The headworks is implanted in a stream of 25 m wide, which occupies the zip line takes 15 m. The grid is railroad tracks 1.20 m long with a spacing between the edges of 0,065 m. The left side of the screen is protected by a wall of stone masonry 2 m wide, 15 m long and slope of 0.5: 1 (H: V) to the center of the wall.

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. The main problem with this decision is towards the left side of it, where there are pieces of gabions destroyed where all water flow is concentrated, resulting in a considerable scour decision. Downstream of the grid, there is a gabion dam built of the same length grid and 2 m thick, which has no role, since all the flow is concentrated on the other bank. According to information system s during the first year of floods, this work was partially destroyed, especially in regard to the waterwheel of the gabion the left margin. This caused the decision is above the bottom of the riverbed. On the other hand, part of the structure of the Tyrolean decision was affected, why now operating about 5 m. System s channel water from about 150 m upstream from the outlet to direct the flow towards the remainder of the zip line takes.

4. Bocatoma PALMA DEL RIO (JUNIN) SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE WORK. Making structure presents a grid of 8 m long and 1.20 m wide, consisting of railroad tracks. The work is protected by two large rocks on both margins. Downstream, at a distance of 14 m, it is a semi destroyed dam that serves to dissipate the energy of water. Decision, before reaching the grid, is protected by channeling walls.

Before reaching the cross - making structure, they exist on both margins cyclopean concrete walls designed to withstand the impact of large boulders. The output structure and sand trap on the left bank are protected by a wall of Cyclopean concrete. PROBLEM AND SOLUTIONS. Unsuitable design instead of making This feature hinders proper maintenance. For example, personal income impossibility for cleaning the gallery collection. For this reason, maintenance is an arduous task, as in this decision, in which s have to remove the stones and sods, through the intake (junction between the gallery and the channel), with a hoe held at the end of a stick. Indicated shows a design that does not include maintenance possibilities. In works designed to capture a high flow rate, in order to facilitate maintenance, the intake could be dimensioned so as to allow the entry of a person for cleaning the gallery. In case the design flow is less and the small gallery, a good alternative is that the grid contains movable modules about one meter. This is closely related to a good location and lower demand maintenance activity. By contrast, takes located in places likely to be affected require higher maintenance activities and economic investment of s, if you do not have the capacity to develop these activities, the shots could be destroyed.

5. Laimina SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE WORK.

Making structure originally had a grid of 4 m long by 1.0 m wide, which is currently left to 300 m downstream of the river because of a landslide in an extraordinary flood. The work is located in a sheltered by rocky outcrops, both in its margins and in the riverbed. Currently, the outlet is functioning as a direct drive with transverse dam the river and the channel protective wall is semi-destroyed. The raceway is correctly positioned and is protected against flooding. The sand trap is 60 m from the outlet and has proper operation.

6. Bocatoma DEL RIO TOACHI SITE SPECIFIC caracterísicas. The intake is 55 m long, is located in the main channel of Titiri river, downstream from the Estancia Cuatro Esquinas. The work is protected by gabion walls channeled on both margins. The rainy season is concentrated between the months of December and March, where there are permanent rains that hinder the work. The Titiri river is torrential, rushing in the rainy season and with intermittent flooding. Presents drag granular medium sized sediments (gravel and sand). The socket is built in cyclopean concrete and has a catchment channel 8.0 m long and 0.60 m section, protected by Decauville rails. The maximum channel capacity is estimated at 410 l / s.

PROBLEM AND SOLUTIONS. Watershed Management: Generally, the design of this work no issues related to watershed management is contemplated. In itself, this is not a

comprehensive work, but rather control of certain fragile sectors during the rainy season suffer landslides. This material is then washed away by the river water, causing sediment entering the gallery and work wear. For example, crumbly slopes can give control of the flow of water through canals collecting and planting native trees and adapted to be maintained for a long period of time.

Overview of causes of deterioration takes a zip line.

- Increased Uptake Capacity: A rustic take, for their constructive characteristics, requires a permanent reinforcement with rocks, grass and plastic for better uptake, however, there is always water leak. With the construction of the shots has improved collection efficiency.

• Inadequate design. • Location of the Work. • Quality of Work.

- Security Collection:

• Unfinished Work. • Protection Works both upstream and downstream. • Watershed Management. • extraction of aggregates from the riverbed for construction. (Amendment of the river profile).

work

A properly constructed zip line ensures security takes water collection at any time. the inversion of the permanent reconstruction of the decision and even the non-availability of water for the destruction of taking in times of flood also is reduced. Reconstruction demand takes additional tasks such as calling people and organize work.

- Reduced Monitoring:

Take advantage of a Tirolesa. - Simple Management: A

uptake. In the situation with rustic take, each used to collect the water with their corresponding tool (hoe, shovel, etc.) to reinforce decision and close the leaks. The zip line was obtained that takes s come to the decision without tools. Thus, it has significantly reduced the supply of labor for the operation of the outlet.

well

conceived and built allows therefore be handled in charge of operation as s. Reduction of Wages and wearisome Relief Faenas: Rustic shots require considerable investment of labor in the reconstruction of decision and also in the operation.

- Pick Simple Water Reduction and Labor: With the construction of decision they have been simplified tasks related to water

With the zip line takes diminish surveillance activities. With a rustic takes the on duty had a permanent concern that the decision be destroyed by anyone trying to steal water. This, especially located in growth areas of agricultural and urban systems, causing strong pressure on the operation of the outlet.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Sustainable Agricultural Development Program (PROAGRO), National Irrigation Program (PRONAR) TOMAS TYROLEAN. Bolivia. 2010 

ARBULU RAMOS, Storage. Lambayeque. 2001 

JOSÉ. -

Works

Alegret Brena, Evio. - Hydraulic Design headworks. 2005 



NWC - headworks. Mexico. 2002