10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Gladiator Fighting Legal Terrorism Home INDIAN PENAL CODE
Helpline Resources
Strategy FAQ
Case Cycle
Strategy to Handle Police CrPC 340-Perjury
Type text to search here...
CrPC 340-Perjury
Follow
Leave a comment Go to comments http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
Follow “Gladiator”
1/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Follow “Gladiator” Guys, As every body here are fighting the Gender Biased laws because our beloved Wives and our In-laws filed False Get every new post delivered Cases against us under different sections of IPC u/sto498 etc, DV ACT and CrPC 125. But this acts has to be your Inbox. fought back hard, as we need every action towards perfection. Here is one of the actions where we can CHECK-MATE 1,056 theother opposition. followers If you have prove that the allegation is wrong & your Wife or In-Laws or any Witness has given false evidence Enter340 your email address with intent to procure conviction then you can file CrPC because 340 Crpc is based on 195 IPC read 195 Ipc Sign me up
Section 195. Giving or fabricatingPowfalse evidence with intent to ered by WordPress.com procure conviction of offence punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment Whoever gives or fabricates false evidence intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, any person to be convicted of an offence which 1[by the law for the time being in force in 2[India] is not capital, but punishable with 3[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for a term of seven years or upwards, shall be punished as a person convicted of that offence would be liable to be punished. Illustration A gives false evidence before a Court of Justice intending thereby to cause Z to be convicted of a dacoity. The punishment of dacoity is 3[imprisonment for life], or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, with or without fine. A, therefore, is liable to3[imprisonment for life] or imprisonment, with or without fine. CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE Punishment—The same as for the offence—Non-cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session— Non-compoundable.
340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195. (1) When upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise any court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interest of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that court, such court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,(a) Record a finding to that effect; (b) Make a complaint thereof in writing; (c) Send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction; (d) Take sufficient security for the appearance for the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the court thinks it necessary so to do send the accused in custody to such Magistrate; and (e) Bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate. (2) The power conferred on a court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the court to which such former court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195. (3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed, http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
2/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
(a) Where the court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the court as the court may appoint; (b) In any other case, by the presiding officer of the court. (4) In this section, “court” has the same meaning as in section 195. If she has given two contradictory statements…she can also be booked for perjury (u/s 340 CrPC)..in the case of Gangawaa and State of Mysore, in the Crl.R.P No 311of 1966 (1967)1 MLJ (Crl) 421..the court has stated that “If the prosecution succeeds in proving that the accused in the witness box deliberately made two statements which are so contradictory and irreconcilable with each other, that both cannot be possibly true, he can be convicted for perjury“ Go ahead and file perjury. Please find link below to know HOW TO FILE PERJURY IN INDIA? http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/how-to-file-perjury-in-india/ S hare this:
Twitter
3
Facebook
20
Like Be the first to like this.
Comments (5) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback 1. ABHA MOHANTY October 12, 2012 at 7:45 pm Reply THE HONORABLE COURTS WORK BEREFT OF EMOTION TO SEE UNDERLYING MALAISE…………..? 2. Mrahi October 12, 2012 at 9:01 pm Reply Just to add… Order 6 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under: “Rule 15. Verification of pleadings. – (1) Save as otherwise provided by any law for the time being in force, every pleading shall be verified at the foot by the party or by one of the parties pleading or by some other person proved to the satisfaction of the Court to be acquainted with the facts of the case. (2) The person ing shall specify, by reference to the numbered paragraphs of the pleading, what he verifies of his own knowledge and what he verifies upon information received and believed to be true. (3) The verification shall be signed by the person making it and shall state the date on which and the place at which it was signed. (4) The person ing the pleading shall also furnish an affidavit in of his pleadings.”. This means there is no need for person to enter the witness box , if he had sign affidavit he shd http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
3/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
be tried for perjury 3. Sundar January 10, 2013 at 10:47 am Reply Dear Sir, Many thanks for your guide lines. in connection with this above article, I could not find the judgment which is referred in your article … “..in the case of Gangawaa and State of Mysore, in the Crl.R.P No 311of 1966 (1967)1 MLJ (Crl) 421..” I searched in Karnataka high court, supreme court. judgment list…. but could not find… SO, I request you to pls provide few more info : the court name, Date of Judgment, judge name, petioner, respondent etc.. So that with this search criteria, we could find.. thanks in advance for ur help . Regards, Sundar… ( suffering by false 498a, dv, Cr.PC125, interim maintenance, etc.. & firmly fighting against these false cases…) 4. 498agladiator January 10, 2013 at 11:42 am Reply Dear Sunder, I just missed out the link the Judgment copy, thanks for your intervention….you can find the same here http://wp.me/p1HnJY-lN. 5. Sundar January 12, 2013 at 12:25 am Reply My heartfelt thanks boss….. Regards, Sundar 1. No trackbacks yet.
Leave a Reply http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
4/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Enter your comment here...
RSS feed
Twitter
Sitemeter
Live Feed
Facebook http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
5/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Amol Kurhe
Create Your Badge
World Map
Paper In Paperli.PaperFrame.Show({id: '87c4a166-e1e5-41a2-9063-ec8e212450e5', width: 390, height: 480, background: '#ECECEC', borderColor: '#DDDDDD'}) youtube er
Do not Copy
Categories Anti Rape Law Application Formats 498A discharge under 239 CrPC Format- Discharge under CrPC 239 in IPC 498a Argument for Discharge 239 Bail -Format CAVEAT Petition-Format Court Techniques Cross Exam Techniques Written Argument http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
6/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
CrPC 91 Divorce Format EXEMPT FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE Perjury CrPC 340 When to File Purjury CrPC 340??? RTI to DGP RTI To Police on False 498a Arrest RTI with Wife's Employer Circulars Maharashtra Cracking 498a Data & Statistics Domestic Violence Act 2005 Fighting KIT-498a Gender Neutral Laws IMD IPC IrBM Judgments 498A Anticipatory Bail Alimony Child Custody Contempt CrPC 125 CrPC 407 Transfer Divorce False Rape Guardians & Wards Act (GAWA) HAMA Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act (HMGA) HMA 24 IT/ Hacking Maintainace in DV Act Perjury PWDVA 2005 Quashing 498a Under Jurisdiction Under Mutual Agreement Without Mutual Consent Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra MRA Multiple maintenance NCRB News http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
7/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Petition RTI CIC Decisions How to get information of private entity under RTI? RTI Campaign RTI Guide Statistics of RTI Data SHWB VAWA Slogans Strategy 498A Child Custody DV Act 2005 Fighting Maintenance General Strategy Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Strategy -Divorce Cases Transfer Petition Videos
Recent Posts CALCUTTA HC:- Coming with unclean hands – disqualifies litigant from obtaining any relief Movie Review – Dawat-e-Ishq Good Women vs Bad Men—An insight into media gender stereotyping False Rape Statistics—Young love often reported as rape in our ‘cruel society’ – The Hindu CALCUTTA HC- The future salary not being a tangible corporeal property the same cannot be attached for recovery of the arrear maintenance. Dowry law misused by disgruntled housewives, stop automatic arrests: SC SC: SC: dowry law the most misused, abused law in India. Police shld follow 9 point checklist as per 41 crpc Bombay HC- Possibility of false implication by Wife cannot be ruled out, hence Anticipatory Bail Granted. Bombay HC- If there is no Domestic Violence on Woman then the children are not entitle for relief u/s. 20 of PWDVA 2005. Bombay HC- CrPC 125(3) procedure to be followed for recovery of due amount/ arrears in PWDVA 2005 instead of issuing Non Bailable order Directly.
Gladiator498a @mymumbra अरे कु ठे ने उन ठे वला महारा माझा??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h @ShivSena 3 hours ago अरे कु ठे ने उन ठे वला महारा माझा??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h @ShivSena @AUThackeray @SanjayRautUvach 3 hours ago अरे कु ठे ने उन ठे वला महारा माझा??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h 3 hours ago http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
8/9
10/6/2014
CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator
Follow @gladiator498a
Disclaimer: The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Law which are bias against the Indian Husband. Thousands of 498A, DV Act 2005 & Maintenance cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.
Meta Entries RSS Comments RSS Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Blogs I Follow 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Men Against Fanny Queefs MAF~Q (MAAF KYON) Fight for Justice Stand up for your rights MyNation Foundation - News ***Fighting Gender biased laws** **www.family-harmony.org*** *National Family Harmony Society* 498A HelpLine 9880141531 6. 498afighthard's Blog 7. WordPress.com News Top Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. The INove Theme.
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/
9/9