Critique On Dead Poets Society 2j76z

Medel

1

Mary Ann Medel Prof Anna Melinda T. De Ocampo English 10 November 10, 2015

What will your verse be?

In 1959, a group of seniors at Wellton Academy, the so-called ‘best preparatory boarding school in America’, became intrigued with the unorthodox methods of teaching by new English teacher, John Keatings. After learning that their new teacher is a member of a club named Dead Poets Society, this group of seniors convened their own Dead Poets Society . What follows are this group’s journey to self-expression with Keating’s encouragement to the seniors of Wellton Academy to believe in themselves, to follow their dreams and to think freely. Written by Tom Schullman and directed by Nick Weir, Dead Poets Society is a film that encouraged people to follow their dreams has even inspired people to be teachers and has given the audience a different perspective in teaching and free-thinking. But contrary to fact, this movie is not a masterpiece some believes it to be, rather it is an above average attempt to showcase unorthodox methods of teaching, poetry and free-thinking. In the opening scenes of the film, the audience learns of Wellton Academy’s motto or the four pillars of the Academy which is “Tradition, Honor, Discipline and Excellence” that every student of the school must uphold. The group of students unconsciously tries break free

Medel

2

from some of these through various. Throughout the film, Keating teaches the boys poetry in a non-conventional manner, making them rip out pages from their textbook and kick footballs. They broke curfew and unofficially created a group without permission of the istration of Wellton Academy. One student, Dalton, writes and publishes an article about the non-ittance of girls in Wellton Academy while another student, Neil, disregards his father’s wishes and proceeds in doing what he wants. These are actions that show signs of non-conformity and individuality. Non conformity is walking ‘to the beat of your own drums.’ At the start of the film, the characters conform to the tradition and rules of the academy but we watch as they try to break free from conformity. In the end, the film shows that if abrupt, non-conformity can lead to harm like the discharge of Keating from the academy. It is a good attempt of writing non conformism but the film only skimmed through the surface of the idea of non-conformity. Non conformity is the deviation from a specification, a standard, or an expectation, this film downplays it at the end where the boys eventually succumb to the istration and their parent’s wishes as they signed the papers that will make Keating dismissed. Yes, at the end the remaining seniors may have given a salute to Keating but it doesn’t change the fact that they succumbed to the expectations of the academy’s istration and had let Keating become the scapegoat. Non Conformism also ties with Romanticism as Romanticism “emphasized the individual, the subjective, the irrational, the imaginative, the personal, the spontaneous, the emotional, the visionary, and the transcendental.” This in turn also dabbles into the opposite movement against Romanticism which is Realism with it. In this film Keating became the personification of the Romanticism movement that goes against the realist concrete walls that the

Medel

3

group of seniors are caged upon. In fact, Keating’s name itself is based on the name of the famous romantic poet John Keats and Keating’s most famous quotation ‘seize the day’ is a romantic term itself with it being used by various well known romantic poets such as Percy Shelly and William Blake. John Keating becomes the personification of romanticism as romanticism became the escape of this group of seniors cooped up within the realist world they live upon. They let themselves indulge upon the idea of ‘seizing the day’ but did not bother to of the consequences of extreme romanticism such as Overstreet’s attempt to woo an already unavailable girl, Dalton’s punching of fellow student Cameron while overwrought with morose, fury and betrayal and Perry’s defense to romanticism through suicide . This extremity in romanticism can be explained through Keating’s purely sentimental teachings. As he teaches them romanticism because we must be ionate on everything we do, he failed to provide at least a little bit of rationality in his teachings because ion is not the only reason why we live. This flaw is also prevalent in his method of teaching. As he taught the seniors about poetry, Keating surprisingly recites and discusses poetry based on his perception of it. He adapted poems to suit his own taste and beliefs. Renowned movie critique, Roger Egbert wrote for the New York Times: “None of these writers are studied, however, in a spirit that would lend respect to their language; they're simply plundered for slogans to exort the students toward more personal freedom. At the end of a great teacher's course in poetry, the students would love poetry; at the end of this teacher's semester, all they really love is the teacher. “

Medel

4

Also nothing about poetry was actually discussed rather it was like the subject became an appreciation course for poetry. Another flaw in Keating’s teaching is that he is biased towards his romantic look in life. Instead being wise and teaching the seniors, Keating taught his students to embrace romanticism as it will let them experience more freedom. As said by the website Antiromantic.com, a website dedicated on the analysis of Dead Poets Society, “By ignoring the contrast between realism and romanticism, his teaching was biased and aided his students in their indulgence into romanticism. From Keating’s students’ perspective, romanticism allowed far more freedom than realism, and once they were confronted with an option of which to embrace, romanticism became the compelling choice. “ His teaching is flawed as he taught the class lessons in relation to romanticism. In teaching, one must be impartial to any ideas in order to encourage the students to form their own opinions. Teacher must be neutral and their work is only to lay the facts upon a table as their role is to encourage critical thinking among the students and, with the facts and ideas laid down on a table, for the students are to draw their own conclusion. This has been commented upon in an online movie review by Kevin Dettmar, a college professor of Pomona University, for the magazine the Atlantic: “For all his talk about students “finding their own voice,” however, Keating actually allows his students very little opportunity for original thought. It’s a freedom that’s often preached but never realized.” This is another failure of Keating as he failed to encourage his students to analyze the poem in their own instead filling them with his own interpretation in an attempt to resonate with his students.

Medel

5

Also this film tends to recycle the stereotype on the characters. Perry is the honor student with a hidden love of art, Dalton is the impulsive beatnik of the group, Anderson is the shy new boy who eventually gains confidence toward the end and Keating is the new teacher that brings forth ideas of romanticism to the seniors’ otherwise bleak school life. The film also lacks depth in some of the characters introduced, especially with teacher John Keating. The film did not reveal Keating’s background and motives in teaching that would have made the public to emphasize with him more. In the same review, Egbert wrote “There is also a curious lack of depth to his character compared with such Another great movie teachers as Miss Jean Brodie and Professor Kingsfield. Keating is more of a plot device than a human being.”

A lot of characters become plot device in order to advance to the story. Also the characters are very static as throughout the film their beliefs or their personality didn’t change except for Anderson and to a lesser extent Perry. Anderson can be considered as the film’s main character as he is the one who have received significant characterizations. At first shy, he slowly gained confidence through Keating’s lessons and through socializing with his newly found friends. His growth became apparent as he confronted Cameron in defense of Keating and as he initiated the salute to Keating. Perry on a smaller scale learned to follow his dreams, which lead to a fall-out with his one-dimensional domineering father and his suicide. The film’s characters had the potential to be more sympathetic to the public but instead the characters ironically conformed to the various film stereotypes. Dead Poets Society, a film that has been voted as the ‘greatest school film’ of all time in an article of The Guardian in 2011, is noble in its attempt to inspire the audience to follow their dreams and to appreciate poetry but has failed in of characterization and making their

Medel

6

theme across. It is a film that though has charmed the hearts of the audience; it contains quite a number of flaws and misconceptions. It is not particularly awful but compared to other films such as Freedom Writers, A Separate Peace and Dangerous Mind, Dead Poets Society is lackluster and its plot is burdened by mountains of sub plot. Although a lot would beg to differ, Dead Poets Society is not a masterpiece; rather it is an above average attempt to showcase nonconformism and poetry.