Case Study 2i6t53

STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS: WHAT AM I LIVING FOR?

After reading the case study and analyzing it, from my opinion I think yes there is anything wrong with the actions of the three personalities- Mr.Bondoc, his wife and Dr. Agao. For elaboration I will explain them one by one. Mr.Bondoc acted as the champion of the student’s cause therefore it’s his responsibility to fight for the own good of the students, the one who will voice out their stands and if possible disagree to the proposals that may greatly affect them like increasing of their tuition fee. It’s great that he has the attitude of convincing others in personal way for them to agree of opposing the proposals of Dr. Agao because of this they can stop his proposals. He must maintain and assure that he is doing his job and must not allow others to control him in bad way or stop him to do his obligation but stated on the case study his wife wished him to maintain good relationship with Dr.Agao which unfortunately leads him to suddenly accept his proposals. It showed that he let others dictate him what to do and failed to do his job. About the wife of Mr.Bondoc, she was carried away by the good actions showed by Dr. Agao without knowing his real intentions of befriending her. She can be easily manipulated like what Dr. Agao wanted her to do through doing special treatments and helped with her business. Like what she did to his husband, she requested him to treat Dr. Agao well because she believes that he can them and give them a lot of benefits. Dr. H.C. Agao on the other side is the main reason of the action of the other characters. We can’t deny that he is smart person and will do anything just to make his plan possible. He didn’t accept the rejection of his proposals so he worked it out and make sure that nobody is in contrast to or against it and then after he can now manage it with ease without anyone or anything intervening. And that’s what he did to Mr. Bondoc by the use of his wife.

Gorgonio, Ma. Cristina G. BSA 3-2